Intellectual property law firm Chicago - Greer Burns & Crain homepage

ATTORNEYS & CONTACT


Patent Trademark Anti-counterfeiting Trade Secret Unfair Competition Licensing IP International IP

About GBC Success Stories Index of United States Patents Granted IP Resources Working at GBC





Patrick G. Burns


Contact
  • pburns@gbclaw.net

  • Direct 312 987 4001

    Education
  • B.S., Electrical Engineering, University of Illinois, 1972

  • J.D., Chicago-Kent College of Law, Illinois Institute of Technology, 1978


  • Patrick G. Burns, Chicago IP attorney



    Experience
    • Patent, trademark and copyright prosecution

    • Opinions on patent infringement, validity and enforceability

    • Patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret litigation in the State and Federal Courts, and in the International Trade Commission

    • Expert Witness in Federal Court Litigation

    Professional Activities
    • Member of the Advisory Board of BNA's Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal

    • President of the Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago, 2009

    • Board of Managers of the Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago, 1997

    • Past Chairman of the Patent, Trademark and Copyright Committee of the Chicago Bar Association

    Awards
    • 2009 Distinguished Alumni Award, Chicago-Kent IP Law Society

    • Named to Leading Lawyer's Network by Chicago Law Bulletin

    • Named an Illinois Super Lawyer by Law & Politics Magazine

    Major Publications
    • Contributing author of 'Designing Around' Valid U.S. Patents, published by the Patent Resources Group

    • Contributing author of Electronics & Computer Patent & Copyright Practice, published by the Patent Resources Group

    Additional Publications and Speeches
    • A Simpler Approach to Claim Construction


      BNA’s Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal, 77 PTCJ 717 (April 2009)

    • In The Wake: The PTO Guidelines On KSR

      Landslide Vol. 1, No. 3; Publication of the ABA Section of Intellectual Property Law (January/February 2009)

    • Effective Patent Prosecution Techniques: Drafting and Amending Patent Claims In Preparation for Litigation

      1st Annual Intellectual Property Institute, IICLE, Chicago, Illinois (2008) DOWNLOAD .PDF

    • In Re: Bilski

      Chicago-Kent College of Law, Chicago, Illinois (September 2008)

      DOWNLOAD .PDF

    • Changes For The Patent Prosecutor: The Guidelines On KSR And Recent Trends In The Written Description And Enablement Requirements

      52nd Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference, The John Marshall Law School, Chicago, Illinois (2008)

    • Drafting Instructions For U.S. Counsel

      Chicago, Illinois (2007) DOWNLOAD .PDF

    • Understanding Patent Infringement Opinions And The Scope Of Patent Protection

      IP Seminar of Tai E International Patent & Law Office, Taiwan (November 2006)

      DOWNLOAD .PDF

    • Examination Guidelines for Determining Obviousness under 35 U.S.C. Section 103 in view of the Supreme Court decision in KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.

      Amicus Curiae, No. 04-1350 (Supreme Court of the United States) (October 2006)

      DOWNLOAD .PDF

    • Willfulness in Patent Litigation

      Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago – The John Marshall Law School (April 2007)

    • The Pros And Cons Of Using Means Plus Function Language In U.S. Patent Claims

      (January 2006) DOWNLOAD .PDF

    • Claim Construction After Phillips

      (January 2006) DOWNLOAD .PDF

    • Recent Developments In U.S. And Japan Patent Law

      Japan (March 2005) DOWNLOAD .PDF

    • What Controls Claim Interpretation, the Dictionary or the Specification?

      Japan (November 2003)

    • Advising Clients on Designing Around in Today’s Ever-Changing World

      40th Annual Program on Intellectual Property Law, The Center for American and International Law, Dallas, TX (November 2002)

    • Applying Prosecution History Estoppel after the Supreme Court’s Decision in Festo

      Chicago Bar Association, (June 2002)

    • Non-Infringement And Invalidity Opinions

      Greer, Burns & Crain in-house Seminar (February 2002) DOWNLOAD .PDF

    • Simplifying / Clarifying The Equivalents Analysis Through Legislation

      Colorado Bar Association (2000) DOWNLOAD .PDF

    • The Scope of Protection for Software

      Japan (November/December 1999)

    • Drafting Better Specifications and Claims in Light of Recent Federal Circuit Decisions

      Japan (November 1999)

    • Preparing U.S. Software Patent Applications for Later Filing in Foreign Countries, Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago – The John Marshall Law School (May 1999)

    • When Can No Reasonable Jury Find Patent Infringement Under The Doctrine Of Equivalents?

      AIPPI (Japan 1999) DOWNLOAD .PDF

    • Translating and Understanding Patentability Opinions

      LES Annual Meeting, Miami, Florida (1998) DOWNLOAD .PDF

    • The Importance of Defining the Inventive Concept in U.S. Patent Claims

      Japan (October 1997)

    • How to Obtain Broad Patent Protection in View of Most Recent CAFC Decisions

      41st Annual Conference on Developments in Intellectual Property Law – The John Marshall Law School (February 1997)

    • Patent Infringement and Patent Prosecution in the U.S.

      AIPPI, Japan (February 1996)

    • Broader Protection For Process Patent Owners Can Create Problems For The Unwary

      Welsh & Katz, Chicago, Illinois, Newsletter Vol. 5, No. 1 (1988-89)

    Bar Memberships
    • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

    • Supreme Court of the State of Illinois

    • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

    • U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals

    • U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals

    • U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

    • U.S. Supreme Court

    Technical Fields

    • Animal Feeding Systems

    • Computer Systems and Circuits

    • Construction Tools

    • Electric Hair Trimmers and Attachments

    • Home Appliances

    • Liquid Crystal Displays

    • Luggage

    • Magnetic and Optical Disk Drives

    • Machine Tools

    • Nuclear Waste Disposal Systems
    • Photographic Equipment

    • Piezoelectric Devices

    • Plasma Display Devices

    • Polymer Activation Systems for Waste Water Treatment

    • Semiconductor Devices

    • Solar Energy Systems

    • Telecommunication Systems


    Contact Chicago IP law firm Greer Burns & Crain

    © 2003-2010 Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. | All Rights Reserved | Terms of Use